• quick revision to show correct spelling.
    1. Reply
    2. 1+ years ago
  • i also just realized i mis-spelled it. oh well, like i said. i'm willing to revise. thanks!
    1. Reply
    2. 1+ years ago
  • #1541, #1542 i'm willing to tweak these after the contest is over if my design is chosen. thank you. these are the same concept. just different color variations. i used an entry to show you. i figured there's not really time for you to mark as needs work. anyhow... thanks again.
    1. Reply
    2. 1+ years ago
  • Thanks, this is a really cool concept, it is running a bit late to ask for revisions, but we will definitely consider it.
    1. Reply
    2. 1+ years ago
  • no need to apologize! It happens all the time with new members. We're working to revise the rules and make them clearer, not a problem, just be more careful! Thanks!
    1. Reply
    2. 1+ years ago
  • I'm sorry!
    1. Reply
    2. 1+ years ago
  • Please only choose one logo per entry. You may show it in color and in black/white, but please choose only one.
    1. Reply
    2. 1+ years ago
  • You can only submit one concept per entry.
    1. Reply
    2. 1+ years ago
  • I have serious doubts that this is a vector image.
    1. Reply
    2. 1+ years ago
  • Nyaruka, would love to have some feedback on 1472 and 1484. I have one more to submit however I was waiting to see if you might have some direction for me. Thank You.
    1. Reply
    2. 1+ years ago
  • Thanks for the revision, looks great.
    1. Reply
    2. 1+ years ago
  • Don't care for the badge on the left. We'd also like to see the text itself worked to be the actual logo.
    1. Reply
    2. 1+ years ago
  • I'd like to see a version of this one, with some tweaks: - solid color - take the tail on the K up a bit - nix the full name underneath Thanks for the submissions.
    1. Reply
    2. 1+ years ago
  • Hi! What was your feeling about #1465?
    1. Reply
    2. 1+ years ago
  • Thanks, but we are going for a cleaner look.
    1. Reply
    2. 1+ years ago
  • This one seems pretty neat. The first letter feels like an a in my head though.
    1. Reply
    2. 1+ years ago
  • fast things (planes, spaceships, missiles ...) tend to look blur in the rear end, this is the idea behind the concept. I hope now you understand why I choose to use a growing blur from right to left, as if the "word" travels with high speed in the "right" direction! sry for my 'bad english:)
    1. Reply
    2. 1+ years ago
  • Coy
    appreciate the feedback. submited my revision.
    1. Reply
    2. 1+ years ago
  • The blur treatment seems a bit odd to me, hard for me to see through that right now.
    1. Reply
    2. 1+ years ago
  • A bit too plain, thanks.
    1. Reply
    2. 1+ years ago