Opinions please!

I like 1st one. Nice typography. But the color palette needs some adjustment. For example- I would replace light-green color from the "Garden" in the 2nd logo.

I like the bottom one. However i would reduce GARDEN to Garden so it does not conflict with the other word.

I would like to see the first (top left) logo with a clean sans-serif typeface. I think this in combination with your graphics will make the logo appear very fresh since your graphics already have that feel.

I like the first one as well, but I would like to see the type from #2 in the graphic from #1 (only centered).

I like the 3rd one best. Simple and would look nice on letterheads/business cards.
I do like the 1st one as well. Though i feel that the only thing it would look great on is a sign....because its big (bulky?) is that the right word? .....i think it would take too much space and distract TOO much from the information. Idk...just my thoughts. Both are great though! Even if the 1st one was used, i still think it would be good. i just think the 3rd is better hehe.

3rd option is the best, however did you tried it in b&w or flatten colors?
I'm afraid it can loose the meaning of company that logo represents.

Maybe try to connect some simple form leaves with 3rd proposition?

I really like the decorative work on the first one, but the font doesn't fit with the 'fresh/modern' leaves. Try a sans serif for Springline. Also try it with no capitals or with just the first letter capitalized for both words.

Maybe don't put the first one in a shield like that. Give it space - maybe just use one or two of the leaf patterns to create an icon/logo that will be recognized on its own.

I like the third (the bottom) one the most. It is really nice. Though I do think that there is something about the word "garden" that I don't quite like. Try it as "Garden" (like dchen05 suggested) or may be try another font to see if it fits better.

The second one is also not bad but somehow I don't think it is distinctive enough for a logo. And I don't think that the leaves are the best symbol to represent a garden.

I definitely don't like the first one for a logo, though many have pointed it out as their favorite one. It looks like a label to me, rather than a logo. I also don't like the typography much.

I like that first one a lot. A lot. It's fresh and sweet - unique too! Very approachable. I agree with others - the fonts are wrong. Sanserif better here.

The first design would work well in a single color. Whereas the others would suffer and loose a lot.

The font in the second looks stretched vertically. I think it's be better squished back down. 'Squished' is a professional term, you know.

Great work! Love it.

i think this might look better if you stick to one type face instead of 2 but thats just my opinion I also would try and use less obvious imagery, plants and leaves are nice but there just plants and leaves i don't see anything that catches my eye

I like the first logo and think it has the most potential. I would simplify the flower design and make it less symmetric (top and bottom). I think that revision might add interest and help people focus on the name of the company. I agree that the font would look nicer in sans serif -- good luck!

I actually think i'm in love with the bottom one. it looks fantastic! it looks so professional.

top left one

thow i think you need to play a little with the "garden".
i don't think it should be so streched... i don't think it's necessery for it to be in the same width. it could work centered and not streched.
i think i would change the color... maybe try to find 2 green shades (that are seperate enought) and apply one to the springline and the other to garden.

it's look like a jello or honey label. i like it

Depends on what it is for.
The top left looks like it'd work well for a label on a bottle.
I'd have to say the bottom would be my favorite if placed on a website or business card.