Jump to content

  • Free consultations and support
  • Live chatClick Here for Live Chat
  • Call ico 1888-906-1888
    Phone support: Open

    Ready for your call :)

    Our business hours:

    Mon — Fri, 2am — 8pm (EST)

    US & EU support teams

    Phone support: Closed

    We are back in: 1h 20m

    Our business hours:

    Mon — Fri, 2am — 8pm (EST)

    US & EU support teams


New logo, please make a feedback.


  • Please log in to reply
&nsbp;

#1 Wassail

Wassail

    Apprentice Designer

  • Designer
  • 51 posts

Posted 12 January 2008 - 08:56 PM

Here's a new logo from me. I wasn't sure about the colors. Please make a feedback.

Posted Image

Logo designing:
The Portfolio Website


#2 Chung Dha

Chung Dha

    Guru

  • Designer
  • 1439 posts

Posted 12 January 2008 - 10:10 PM

You should keel equal thickness on the whole shape. Also a more squared font because the illustration is squared

Also I donno why but I have seen it before just don't remember where or which shape. Or game cube maybe.

#3 Wassail

Wassail

    Apprentice Designer

  • Designer
  • 51 posts

Posted 12 January 2008 - 10:12 PM

the illustration squared, that why I made the font elliptical, the opposition could be nice.

If you can find the logo which is similar to this, please inform or link me, so I will change it, thanks :)

thats what you mean ?

http://www.cheaterss...be/gamecube.jpg

Logo designing:
The Portfolio Website


#4 _Redrum

_Redrum

    Retired Admin

  • Designer
  • 1957 posts

Posted 12 January 2008 - 10:41 PM

Chung Dha, normally I would agree with you, but I don't think the round font is that much of a problem in this case: While a square font would probably look more appropriate, the contours of the font and the symbol both appear very simplistic and engineered, so it seems to work.

The thing that bothers me is the fact that this shape would collapse in real life; it's completely unbalanced. If the basis of the symbol is stacking shapes on top of each other, then you should make sure that they look solidly constructed. As an added "bonus", the lack of balance creates the effect that something is missing from the right side.

The design certainly has its appeal. I would rethink it a bit, though.

#5 Wassail

Wassail

    Apprentice Designer

  • Designer
  • 51 posts

Posted 12 January 2008 - 10:48 PM

I'm confused about the same think redrum. I'd put something on right side, but nothing came to my mind. I was goin to put columns like left side, but then I said, whats the meaning ? Why would I ? Because I added that green part which symbols the S later, and firstly I was going to put that green T part to right side, but couldnt find a good place/shape. Secondly like you said about the font, I agree with you. If both (illust. and font) were squared, it would be normal. I just want something different from "normal", and thought that two opposite ideas could complete themselves.

I will rethink it. Thanks for the nice feedback.

Logo designing:
The Portfolio Website


#6 rinaldidesigns

rinaldidesigns

    Elite Designer

  • Designer
  • 2258 posts

Posted 12 January 2008 - 10:53 PM

I think you need to kern the font, looks too tight, give the font some breathing room;).....I like the mark though...and color...but it does seem incomplete, off balance, maybe play with perspectivE?

#7 Wassail

Wassail

    Apprentice Designer

  • Designer
  • 51 posts

Posted 12 January 2008 - 10:56 PM

ah, you're right about the kern I guess, it can have more space. I played with perspective before I came out with this. In my opinion the thing stands behind "adding something". Doing some revision.

Thanks rinaldi!

Logo designing:
The Portfolio Website


#8 Chung Dha

Chung Dha

    Guru

  • Designer
  • 1439 posts

Posted 12 January 2008 - 11:51 PM

I think you should leave out the green part though. Here is a idea for the design: Use left and top both to form a S for a S and use the right side for the C. Make the name Scuffle Creek and below Technology.

#9 _Redrum

_Redrum

    Retired Admin

  • Designer
  • 1957 posts

Posted 13 January 2008 - 12:28 AM

I have an idea too, but it's hard to see with just words. I could post it if I have your permission :)

#10 Wassail

Wassail

    Apprentice Designer

  • Designer
  • 51 posts

Posted 13 January 2008 - 08:13 AM

Go ahead, sure gladly :)

Logo designing:
The Portfolio Website


#11 _Redrum

_Redrum

    Retired Admin

  • Designer
  • 1957 posts

Posted 13 January 2008 - 08:25 PM

Go ahead, sure gladly :)


I was thinking of something like this. With the "S" in blue and "Scufflecreek" being all one word.

#12 Wassail

Wassail

    Apprentice Designer

  • Designer
  • 51 posts

Posted 13 January 2008 - 08:36 PM

Thats what I thought after the Chung's last post. Thanks for realizing the idea though. :)

ps : same color for scufflecreek seems nice.

Cheers red.

Logo designing:
The Portfolio Website


#13 mgustofson

mgustofson

    Apprentice Designer

  • Designer
  • 11 posts

Posted 14 January 2008 - 02:03 AM

not bad, that is definately a sophisticated logo..

#14 Uniment1

Uniment1

    Apprentice Designer

  • Designer
  • 381 posts

Posted 14 January 2008 - 05:20 PM

The text will look better if you make it a little bit lighter. Also maybe a little more space between the letters of your type(increase kerning) would be nice.
It looks pretty good thus far :)
www.uniment1.com :: Design Services

#15 bigyou

bigyou

    Apprentice Designer

  • Designer
  • 82 posts

Posted 14 January 2008 - 08:37 PM

I have to agree with Uniment1 about type work. Try fine tuning this a bit. It would definitely help.

I'm also challenging the little textures on the different sides of the logo. I find them a little bit distractive. I think I would drop them and use solid colors everywhere.

Hope this helps !
Youan L. Gagnon - Graphic Designer | Portfolio

#16 _Redrum

_Redrum

    Retired Admin

  • Designer
  • 1957 posts

Posted 15 January 2008 - 01:21 AM

I'm also challenging the little textures on the different sides of the logo

Those are compression artifacts. They're not part of the logo :)

#17 bigyou

bigyou

    Apprentice Designer

  • Designer
  • 82 posts

Posted 15 January 2008 - 02:57 AM

Those are compression artifacts. They're not part of the logo :)


Hmmm... Glad to read this ;)
Youan L. Gagnon - Graphic Designer | Portfolio

#18 Deathdart

Deathdart

    Senior Member

  • Designer
  • 140 posts

Posted 16 January 2008 - 07:38 AM

Hey, I guess you've tried to show SCT through the 3D mark, however I really don't see a T in it. Or maybe you've just showed an SC? Also, even though I like the form of the symbol, I feel it look too much like a cross between the Playstation logo (the multicolored one) and the gamecube logo. Just because of my association of the form with these logos, I feel it looks a lot like a gaming logo.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
AbhaySingh.in - Graphic Design Portfolio
___________________

#19 Wassail

Wassail

    Apprentice Designer

  • Designer
  • 51 posts

Posted 16 January 2008 - 02:01 PM

Can be :) the left yellow part symbolies the below of the T and blue wings are the top.

Logo designing:
The Portfolio Website


#20 Deathdart

Deathdart

    Senior Member

  • Designer
  • 140 posts

Posted 19 January 2008 - 01:38 PM

Oh now I get it, but you would have to look at it from a different angle to be able to recognize it as a T :)
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
AbhaySingh.in - Graphic Design Portfolio
___________________




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users