Feedback needed for my portfolio logo
Hey,I've been working on creating a new portfolio website lately. I'm calling it fluidCORE and...
&nsbp;
#1
Posted 25 May 2008 - 06:07 AM
Hey,
I've been working on creating a new portfolio website lately. I'm calling it fluidCORE and I've just finished a polished version of the logo for it. I would really appreciate it if some of you could have a look and let me know what you think of it, the good and the bad. All constructive criticism is welcome. You can have a look at it at:
http://deathdart.dev...ogo-v1-86580384
Thanks a lot!
- Abhay
I've been working on creating a new portfolio website lately. I'm calling it fluidCORE and I've just finished a polished version of the logo for it. I would really appreciate it if some of you could have a look and let me know what you think of it, the good and the bad. All constructive criticism is welcome. You can have a look at it at:
http://deathdart.dev...ogo-v1-86580384
Thanks a lot!
- Abhay
#2
Posted 25 May 2008 - 03:33 PM
The Fl looks too much like a H for people who don't know your company will read it Huidcore. And I think the thin and thick contrast may be bigger because the thickness are between the two are not really too big.
#3
Posted 25 May 2008 - 06:14 PM
Yes, I've got that a lot. The purpose of the "Fl" was to emphasize the fluidity of it, but I guess it's not obvious enough. I'll be doing a new version of the logotype. Thanks for the feedback
#6
Posted 31 May 2008 - 07:17 AM
I wouldn't say I read it like an "h" but I definitely cannot recognize the "l" here. It doesn't look like "l" at all to me.
Aside from that, I think you should be consistent with the font for the whole word. I mean if you have started with connected "f" and "l", you should proceed with connected "fluid" letters for the rest of the word ("u", "i", and "d").
Aside from that, I think you should be consistent with the font for the whole word. I mean if you have started with connected "f" and "l", you should proceed with connected "fluid" letters for the rest of the word ("u", "i", and "d").
#8
Posted 02 June 2008 - 07:18 PM
I love the icon you created - very modern/futuristic.
I agree with everyone on the f and the l - a few tweaks should get it, though. I wouldn't completely re-do it.
Just asking this as a design student about to graduate - why are you 'naming' your portfolio?
Anna
I agree with everyone on the f and the l - a few tweaks should get it, though. I wouldn't completely re-do it.
Just asking this as a design student about to graduate - why are you 'naming' your portfolio?
Anna
#10
Posted 15 June 2008 - 09:23 PM
Overall I think it is a good use of fonts. I thought since the "fl" combo is such an issue, maybe simply keep it two separate letters. Perhaps the "f" and the "l" could be separated in a way that mimics the red shapes you have in the logo-- kind of an oil/water thing going on.
#14
Posted 03 July 2008 - 08:50 PM
Have you considered running all of the font weights and cases the same? I just feel like the logo is very right heavy.. Might need to balance a smidge more.
I was just going to suggest this...at least decrease the thickness of the red shapes
must admit though it looks like I've see this logo before
----> Winter's Blogspot!! <----
#15
Posted 05 July 2008 - 04:23 PM
I noticed you were trying to differentiate the "fluid" from the "core" by making the core a bit bolder, and I think I might be seeing a drop shadow there too? Maybe? (Not sure on that.) But, I personally, might think about finding another color for one or the other to show a separation, or take one half to a lighter level, instead. At first, I thought you forgot to bold the first half and then I realized what you were actually doing. Just my opinion, other than that I like it. The "fl", I have to agree with all on that.
Nice work!
Nice work!
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users