

Is the green background on the 2nd to much?
Ready for your call :)
Mon — Fri, 2am — 8pm (EST)
US & EU support teams
We are back in: 1h 20m
Mon — Fri, 2am — 8pm (EST)
US & EU support teams
Posted 25 September 2008 - 04:08 AM
Edited by _Redrum, 25 September 2008 - 04:10 AM.
Posted 25 September 2008 - 09:32 AM
Posted 25 September 2008 - 07:42 PM
Posted 25 September 2008 - 11:42 PM
Not bad I like it... but at the same time i dont... thanks for the idea though![ATTACH]5375[/ATTACH]
Here is the direction I would take this design. Feel free to add, use, or ignore any part of it.
This is what I did:
1) Changed the colors
2) Lowered the E
3) Changed the font for design
4) added the smily face in a larger o
Posted 26 September 2008 - 04:12 AM
Thats the problem I havent the slightest clue! i have no ideas about that at all it takes time to think about these things mean while my dad is trying to rush meThat's fine, it's a bit cartoony.
What is your concept? What do you want the logo to communicate?
Posted 26 September 2008 - 06:29 AM
Posted 26 September 2008 - 05:26 PM
Posted 26 September 2008 - 07:07 PM
I honestly think that you're trying a little too much with the name.
The fonts you used for 'En Joy' and 'Design' don't fit together. While you used a script-type (calligraphy) font for the 'En Joy', you're using a techno kind of font for 'Design'. I really can't encourage combining these type of fonts.
All I can say, and I'm gonna be honest about this, is that you should dare to simplyfy the logo a bit. It wil look less like a drawing then. Dare to go for something totally different! Don't feel you have to stick with the first idea! Good luck mate
Posted 27 September 2008 - 12:58 AM
1. The contrast between the font styles, which highlights the fact that designs produced by this company or person are both elegant and hip
2. The decoration of the letter "i" to look like a person seems to imply that the company is people-oriented; and
3. There appears to be some sort of party going on with the scribbles between the text. I'm not sure what the meaning of those is, but it definitely adds a new point of interest to the logo that is separate from the other two. If, as you mentioned, they really are just nonsense scribbles, I would cut them out entirely
Premise 1: All ducks are birds
Premise 2: All birds have wings
---
Conclusion: Therefore, all ducks have wings
Edited by _Redrum, 27 September 2008 - 01:00 AM.
Posted 27 September 2008 - 06:16 PM
1. The contrast between the font styles, which highlights the fact that designs produced by this company or person are both elegant and hip
Posted 27 September 2008 - 10:18 PM
I think the second design is definitely an improvement. However, you should consider taking it a level further. Currently I can see at least three different ideas in your logo:
1. The contrast between the font styles, which highlights the fact that designs produced by this company or person are both elegant and hip
2. The decoration of the letter "i" to look like a person seems to imply that the company is people-oriented; and
3. There appears to be some sort of party going on with the scribbles between the text. I'm not sure what the meaning of those is, but it definitely adds a new point of interest to the logo that is separate from the other two. If, as you mentioned, they really are just nonsense scribbles, I would cut them out entirely
At this point you should try to either focus on only one of those three concepts, or find a way to bring them all together in harmony. Right now there are three distinct sections in the logo: "En Joy" is section 1; "Designs" with the little person figure is section 2; and the squiggles are section 3. To fully digest the design, a viewer has to interpret all three sections. And since (as I mentioned above) they all say something different about the business, interpreting all of them is not as easy as it should be.
The main problem with having things separated is that the viewer's brain struggles to figure out what exactly the logo is trying to say. Here's a rather bland but powerful analogy. Imagine your logo is a logical argument. A logical argument is a line-by-line argument that is composed of premises followed by a conclusion. Example:
Premise 1: All ducks are birds
Premise 2: All birds have wings
---
Conclusion: Therefore, all ducks have wings
Now lets say I were to have a conversation with someone who has no idea that ducks have wings, and I want to inform her that they do in fact have wings. What should I say to make it easiest for her to understand? Should I give her the premises separately and leave out the conclusion? Or should I give her the conclusion by itself and spare her the time of trying to figure it out from the premises? I would say the conclusion is easiest.
Now relate that to your logo, where you are trying to inform people about your business --a business they otherwise know absolutely nothing about. Your current design is giving people little tidbits (the premises) but instead you should simply give them the conclusion. Just find one visual that explains to them what EnJoy Designs is, and make that your logo.
Show someone the logo for three seconds, and if there is a detail they cannot remember after that, get rid of it.
Good luck
Posted 28 September 2008 - 01:20 PM
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users