Jenna Sheffler.net
As far as the portfolio content goes, it's still a work in progress. Once I finish a few of my latest projects, I'll swap those for a few of my older/weaker designs.
Looking forward to people's comments/suggestions. Thanks!

Ready for your call :)
Mon — Fri, 2am — 8pm (EST)
US & EU support teams
We are back in: 1h 20m
Mon — Fri, 2am — 8pm (EST)
US & EU support teams
Posted 15 June 2009 - 02:18 AM
Posted 15 June 2009 - 02:41 AM
Edited by Deathdart, 15 June 2009 - 02:45 AM.
Posted 15 June 2009 - 05:44 AM
Posted 16 June 2009 - 11:29 PM
Posted 16 June 2009 - 11:33 PM
Posted 17 June 2009 - 01:35 AM
Posted 17 June 2009 - 05:02 AM
smack, thanks for reminding me about optimizing my images! That's what I get for updating my site on 3 hours of sleep (gotta love insomnia). I optimized the layout images, but still need to filter through and fix some of the logos.
Posted 19 June 2009 - 08:16 PM
Much better Jenna
It still takes a second to load, but it's so much quicker. I would still try to find a way to have it so there is no lag and no jpeg icon before the image appears.
Posted 20 June 2009 - 07:07 PM
Posted 24 June 2009 - 10:59 PM
Hi Jenna,
I'm Running Mac OS X 10.5.7
I normally use Firefox as most people visiting your site will be using that browser - see Browser Statistics
I tried it with Safari as well and though it doesn't show the icon, it still takes a second and I don't think it needs to for images this size. My site images are about the same size and don't seem to load. When you optimized the images did you resize them? ( say to 500px x 500px ) I know sometimes even though they are optimized and viewing correctly on screen, the actual image size is much larger and this could be what is causing the load time.
just a thought.
( I don't mean to be picky, but these are the little things that drive me crazy about my site )
Posted 29 August 2009 - 08:15 PM
Posted 29 August 2009 - 11:49 PM
I love the bright bold style you are capturing, and I believe is reminiscent of the work of Pop Comic artist Roy Lichtenstein (Roy Lichtenstein Prints and Posters at Art.com). One thing I noticed about your illustration is that the lines are all the same width. You might create more depth and more of a hand-inked look by outlining your path and varying the widths of your outlines.
Regarding the website, I'm not sure I'd open it with a bio page, but I know that one-page websites have been the rage for awhile, which would naturally incorporate bio and contact and portfolio information all together. I know that Smashing Magazine recently did a piece on this and had lots of examples.
Posted 03 September 2009 - 04:35 AM
Edited by tsmith, 03 September 2009 - 04:38 AM.
Posted 21 September 2009 - 02:58 AM
I am not going to critique the overall look of the site, as I respect each artist's decision on how they want to portray their profile.
However! I can offer some advice on how to make your page a bit more modern and cut down on load time, etc.
1. I-Frames are bad for a variety of reason I won't go into. You can achieve the same results for your portfolio images by using a fixed height/width div and setting overflow to scroll or auto. If you REALLY want to keep the arrows and no scroll bar, you can use AJAX or something but I don't think you want to get that advanced. Alternatively, you can leave the arrow graphic on the bg image and use the overflow:scroll option and the user should get the picture.
2. I would split your page into divs and absolute position the items. For example: make the main container block one div, your name title another, the menu another and just position them all accordinly. If you'd like, I can make a barebones template or write out some code for you so you can see how it would look.
3. Get yourself some keywords/meta tags, etc!
That's really it. You have a unique page and it looks great, but I am always preaching for people to use CSS over tables and I see lots of potential for making your site much more cross-browser compatible and search engine friendly
Edit: Regarding adding your email...do so at your own risk. I support contact forms over just throwing out your email for spam mail purposes.
Posted 21 September 2009 - 04:00 PM
Posted 01 October 2009 - 12:23 AM
Posted 01 October 2009 - 12:26 AM
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users