Earth Song Jewelry

First, I want to say that working with the wining designer I chose (mcsanjose22) was great. He came up with original artwork and logo ideas. He obviously read my brief, took that into consideration and incorporated my ongoing feedback when submitting his logo designs. Communication with him was very clear and we worked well together. After choosing the winning design, he delivered exactly what I requested, in the file formats I needed. Everything was done quickly and efficiently. I have made him one of my favorite designers and would absolutely work with him again! As for in general… I posted my detailed brief (as a PDF) and at first only a few people submitted ideas. BUT, as I started giving detailed feedback I noticed that more and more designers submitted ideas. There were designers that clearly looked at the brief and feedback I was giving to the previously submitted designs and created their own logo ideas, which was great. Of course, there ended up also being designers who obviously read nothing and submitted logos that were 100% off the mark. Those designers created a lot of wasted time for me, as I had to go through their designs anyway to reject them. Clearly, DC is correct - if you are engaged and give good feedback, more designers will participate and you will get a lot more ideas. I ended up with 266 submittals - although that is a very inflated number, as many submittals were just for minor changes I requested in my feedback. So, I’d say I had maybe 1/3rd of that as original designs - so about 80… which is a LOT. I’d say I had 40-50 reasonable /good original designs in that 80. The feedback process if very easy and it’s easy to look back at the comments you have given related to any specific design. I like that if you are commenting on design #1, but mention design #2 in that comment, DC will attach the comment to design #2 also and make it so you see images of both design #1 and #2 with that comment. It really helps that they do that. In the end, I winnowed down to the top designs and eliminated the rest to clean up my dashboard. Surprisingly, I ended up liking designs that didn’t meet all of the things I had laid out in my brief! After seeing what I had described and then seeing alternatives that still fit my input, and testing out the designs with mock prints of my earring cards and business cards, it became clear that what I originally imagined was not the best design. So, it’s great to have designers submitting their take of logo ideas that incorporated the feel of what I described but gave new styles. It all worked out great in the end. Honestly, there were a number of really interesting original designs that would have worked if I didn’t need to fit specific parameters of printing on small earring cards and retail hang tags. Overall, I’d say that if you take the time to write a good brief - give the idea of what you are looking for, your branding voice and how you will be using your logo - and then give pointed feedback, you will get a good number of original designs on DesignContest. Be SURE you have time set aside for the week of your contest to go through all the submittals and give useful feedback! It does take a chunk of your time - but the faster you can give feedback, the faster you will get new and revised logos. A 5-star experience and I ended up with a 5-star designer! Here are some changes I’d like to see on ... - DC needs a better chat function. After choosing the winning design, you can message back and forth with the designer. But, the DC messaging setup is not linear and makes it hard to scroll through and keep track of where you are in the discussion. They should just use a basic chat function instead of what they implemented. - There should be a way to click a button to “ding” designers who just dump a lot of submittals when they have clearly read nothing and are just dumping what seems to be random ideas to see if one will stick. It caused a lot of wasted time for me. I’m sure those designers do the same on other contests, so there should be a way to get that feedback in to DesignContest so they can do something about those folks. - On that note, there should also be a way to “ding” designers who are clearly ripping off other designs. That’s just not cool. At the closing days of my contest, I had a swell of designers submitting designs that essentially copied the design elements from the top rated logos I had. I do not respect that and would not pick a designer who does that. It’s fine to get ideas from top designs, but to basically copy the same elements is not right. Thanks for reading, Cynthia Earth Song Jewelry


$325 paid

313 custom designs

51pre-qualified designers

Learn more about Logo Design Contest

Winning design #313 by mcsanjose22, Logo Design for Earth Song Jewelry Contest
Gold Medal

designed by mcsanjose22

Project description

>> PLEASE read the latest comment I added on July 16, 2019. Thanks! 

I’m looking for a logo that includes a designed image and my new company name - Earth Song Jewelry - next to it. I checked "pictoral mark" because I need a logo, but I also need the name of the company, just not as part of the logo image, so not a "wordmark". 

I wrote up what kind of logo I’m looking for, my brand messaging, colors and included examples of logos and fonts that I like (and what I do not like) in a PDF file that I attached to this project. Please read through it for the details of what I am looking for so you know what style of designs to submit.

NEW INFO and FILE UPLOADED: July 12 2019 - I uploaded an image of my current company earring cards and hang tag. This is for your reference so you can see how I need a logo to fit on the 2" x 2" earring card and the 1" wide x 1-3/4" long hang tag card. Of course, I'll also use the new logo for my biz cards, website and social media avatars. Since avatars are so small, any logo image would need to be recognizable in as a small avatar. Note that on the earring card, the earrings will hang down and block the right and left sides of the card.  The holes are currently 7/8" apart, I could make the next batch 1" apart, but not much further. So, please think of you logo image as fitting between the holes and being printed 5/8" wide. 

Any questions, please let me know.
I’m excited to see what ideas the community comes up with!

Read full brief


  • ESJ
    About #313, @mcsanjose22 I think this will be IT!

    I will check on line thickness and do a biz card print mockup when I get back home later today. I need to go offline now and get ready to leave, but you are good to go! Thanks so much!
  • ESJ
    About #313, @mcsanjose22 Yup, I like this one better! Thanks! ;)
  • ESJ
    I love the leaves and water drop design - but after testing a lot of shapes this week I've decided to use the round shape. I'm finalizing which logo I'll pick from the ones I currently have. Great idea, though! thanks. #312
  • ESJ
    About #310, @mcsanjose22 I think it will look better with the sun removed completely. I did that using photoshop and liked it better with no sun. :) See my previous comment to you for more info.
  • ESJ
    No thanks. I've already got enough versions to make my final decision. I don't need any new designs. Thank you. #307
  • ESJ
    About #279, @mcsanjose22 I should have added that the clouds in front of the sun can probably go away. They don't look as good when small. Kind of like a lightening bolt across the sun. No emergency, I can look at a revision if you already have it with the sun still like this.
  • ESJ
    When printed on my earring card mockups, the components looked a bit disconnected from each other. It looks nice on the computer, but not right on the smaller card. #271
  • ESJ
    I like #270 better with the colors. So will eliminate this one. #239
  • ESJ
    No thank you. I currently have enough designs for my final decision. #304
  • ESJ
    No thank you. I currently have enough designs for my final decision. #305
  • ESJ
    I like this, but I'm deciding if I prefer this design with more mountains or the ones with just two mountains. #260
  • ESJ
    Narrowing down, I prefer the other outside border version. #256
  • ESJ
    About #279, @mcsanjose22 OK, when printed in my mockups, I like parts of from different designs. ;p I like the sharper mountains in this design #279. Unfortunately, the new trees didn't look good on the earring cards. They look good on the computer, but not smaller. They lose their trunks and look like blobs. So.... I think that if you used the mountains from this design and used your original trees it would look good because the hand drawn trees are balanced out by the sharper mountains.

    Also - I don't like this thicker line river at all. I like the river line thickness from back on #170. Same for the mountains - can you make the line less thick - more like you had in #170?

    For the border - I like the idea you have here, but can you make the outside thinner border purple. That will tie the colors all together, I think.

    I really, really like the shape of your mountains and river the best of the designs - so I'm hoping we can get the trees right.

    The line thickness I assume we can fiddle with until it looks good on both earring cards and a business card (I will print biz card mockups next, I just wanted to get feedback re the earring cards in right away since those are the most important of anything).
    thanks! Let me know if any questions. c-
  • ESJ
    Hi all,
    Please don't submit new entries today unless you are one of the designers who are already rated in my set of 90+. I like the selection I've got and need to narrow it down from those designs.
  • ESJ
    I prefer a river, not a road. Thanks! #302
  • ESJ
    No thanks. You can see where my style preference is by looking at the rated entries. #301
  • ESJ
    What? Not sure what this is supposed to be. #300
  • ESJ
    This is a duplicate on a card, so eliminating it. #273
  • ESJ
    eliminating this version on the card since it's easier for me to look at the other submittals on the plain white background. This is a duplicate of one of those. #264
  • ESJ
    About #269, @mcsanjose22 I will eliminate this and #268. I like the other newer version better.