-
Registered User
-
Registered User
It seems delicate and nice, I like it.
Just two observations:
1. doesn't remind me any hennas I have seen before.
2. I miss the connection of the flower and the text.
-
Elite Designer
I agree with borsi regarding the connection between the flower and text.
I like the stroke used for the arabic letters -- that seems to relate to the flower better. Maybe use a similar stroke style for the english text? And vary the stroke width on the flower? Just some thoughts. I do like the logo BTW.
-
From what I see the positioning of the logo make them fall apart and looks like 2 seperate things. You should move the flower closer to the text. For the rest it looks good just work on the positioning of the flower.
-
Registered User
yes, moving it closer to the text and aligning the flower to the center of the page might make it look a bit more appealing.
maybe have the flower connect with some of the text, just some ideas.
Last edited by SMJdesign; 09-05-2008 at 10:37 AM.
-
Elite Designer
I like it too, but I'm concerned it's a bit complex. Rule #1 for logo design, it must be able to look fabulous when it's 300% size as well as 1/16% size. If this gets real small (postage stamp size), you'll loose all recognition of the flower. Just something to keep in mind.
I love the colors you've used.
Good luck with it all.
-
Registered User
It's definitely intriguing, but it has a very weird tension to it. The typography doesn't compliment the mark very well.
-
i agree with what another users said .
here is my sugestions :
1. try to use hennas colour (dark (red) brown).
2. maybe u can make flower look more like a tatto style. without pink colour.
-
Registered User
Good comments from members here.
I see how you modified the last letter of the typeface to connect it to the Indian script. How about making sure the other letters connect to each other? The tails of the letter "o"s start at the bottom and angle up. Maybe you can play with these connections so you get better ligatures (character combinations combined into a single glyph)? Think about integrating the type and the flower rather than just positioning them next to each other. Can the type encircle or otherwise contain the flower or vise-versa? Maybe the flower could go under the loop of the final "h"? Watch the thickness of that character while you're at it. It doesn't match the other letters. If it were thin on the left and thick on the right, it might make a better transition into the script.
-
Registered User
I think the flower could go a little lower, but it's nice!
-
Registered User
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
Bookmarks