Graphic company logo

[batastrophe]

hmm... I am just not liking it. the basic idea is okay, maybe you need a burning brush or something... maybe that's too much, but it feels like it's missing something.

[lena]

I agree with [pliny.Design]. U should remove flame on i, just plain dot or nothing. font is kewl by himself so don't need any other symbols.
thmbs up for the latest version (vertical aligment).

[ctrl.alt.design]

the difference in fonts i think may be throwing me off, the b and f in brushfire look a bit off to me.

[norydendevora]

I use Adobe Illustrator. Versatile software.

[like an angel]

i just LOVE this v.3

looking much better than the ones before it & it looks alot better on a brown background
great colors & great design

[vulcanwolf]

wow looks really good now at v.3

love the colours used

[logwad]

version 3 but lose the line in the main logo that cuts the shape into two pieces. since you've done that it translates as a drop of liquid this may cause some confusion if the logo were to be left on its own without any logotype. if your logo is a strong one it should translate without any words to lead you. IMO

[logwad]

unless ambiguity is intended, which in this case i am assuming it isn't

[Eyllyana89]

i like your idea..^^

[Jradical]

I think its a cool simple and strong graphic myself. The name and colors are catchy. good job!